There's not so much an employment problem as there is a recruiting problem. Recruiters do much more harm than good, to both job seekers and employers. Contract agency recruiters are the worst, idiots of the business village, but all types of companies are reported here. Lying, refusing to respond, ruining chances with botched submissions, spamming, sheer incompetence -- those are the losers we're calling out.
Index of contents
Recruiter Hall of Shame index
|
|
|
Sunday, March 30, 2014
Tressa Cooper - ARC, Austin, TX
Infuriation: Refusal to respond to communications that she had requested
Update: As of 2016, this waste of oxygen works as a (Senior) recuiter at The HT Group, also in Austin. She's still wasting oxygen obliviously, undoubtedly.
Tressa Cooper, who works for a body shop (contract resume shuffler) called ARC in Austin, TX, is another waste of oxygen who has obstinately refused to respond to candidate communications AFTER SHE SOLICITED THEM. Perhaps the job was no longer available, and there are only a couple of reasonable explanations why that might have been the case: it could have already been filled, as these bottom-feeders scrambling after the same position are like minnows scrambling after crumbs in the water, and another bottom-feeding recruiter may have already filled the job. The job might have been put on hold for some reason by the client (hiring) company, and of course, that's outside the control of both the waste-of-oxygen recruiter and the candidate. These would warrant a brief, one-line "Job's no longer available" return message.
But there's absolutely no reason to ignore TWO professionally courteous, succinct return communications that the recruiter solicited herself. No reason, that is, for a reasonable professional, but since we're talking about recruiters, who knows what single-neuron reason she gave herself for snubbing the candidate.
Update: As of 2016, this waste of oxygen works as a (Senior) recuiter at The HT Group, also in Austin. She's still wasting oxygen obliviously, undoubtedly.
Tressa Cooper, who works for a body shop (contract resume shuffler) called ARC in Austin, TX, is another waste of oxygen who has obstinately refused to respond to candidate communications AFTER SHE SOLICITED THEM. Perhaps the job was no longer available, and there are only a couple of reasonable explanations why that might have been the case: it could have already been filled, as these bottom-feeders scrambling after the same position are like minnows scrambling after crumbs in the water, and another bottom-feeding recruiter may have already filled the job. The job might have been put on hold for some reason by the client (hiring) company, and of course, that's outside the control of both the waste-of-oxygen recruiter and the candidate. These would warrant a brief, one-line "Job's no longer available" return message.
But there's absolutely no reason to ignore TWO professionally courteous, succinct return communications that the recruiter solicited herself. No reason, that is, for a reasonable professional, but since we're talking about recruiters, who knows what single-neuron reason she gave herself for snubbing the candidate.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment